The campaign your campaign could spread like

Old Spice and Wieden + Kennedy are well aware that they have a serious megahit on their hands with Isaiah Mustafa, aka "The Man Your Man Could Smell Like." He's done the two main TV spots, as well as the mustache clip, and now, in a truly fantastic addition to the campaign, he's doing a slew of personalized videos in which he thanks individual people—bloggers, YouTube commenters, Twitterers, celebrities—who've complimented his ads online.

I've been waiting for someone to do this for a while now. Pretty awesome how well W+K has done this. It's contextually relevant to all the right online communities and sub-cultures.

Perhaps my uncanny knowledge of memes and internet sub-cultures will one day be valuable. Probably not, but one can hope. :)

Filed under  //

Comments [0]

A terrible victory

This decision means that other user generated content services will not have to make the choice that YouTube had to make. Judge Stanton ruled that YouTube was operating within the framework of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) which says that web services that have infringing material in them must respond to take down notices but do not have to proactively weed out their services of all infringing material.

This is a huge victory for entrepreneurs and the web. I am ecstatic.

via avc.com

I kind of wanted Viacom to win this one. As much as I love YouTube, and as big a proponent I am of the safe harbor provisions set forth by the DMCA, YouTube took it too far. 

The reality is that YouTube didn't get to be #1 as quickly as it did by letting people upload videos of their cats. For a few years YouTube was the place to go for network television and other pirated content that they didn't have the rights to. They operated with impunity. I remember watching full episodes of The Daily Show, South Park, and The Colbert Report. It was this content, not lonleygirl15, that launched YouTube into the #1 spot. 

I'm not sure what Fred Wilson means by, "... a huge victory entrepreneurs and the web." How is this a victory? You can hide behind a safe harbor law to build an empire off of the hard work of others? At least half of the $1.6 billion they ended up selling for was value created through piracy. That's not a win in my book.

Filed under  //

Comments [0]

Twitter, Facebook and YouTube for the Fortune 100

The study found that 65 percent of the largest 100 international companies have active accounts on Twitter, 54 percent have a Facebook fan page, 50 percent have a YouTube channel, and one-third (33 percent) have corporate blogs. Only 20 percent of the major international companies are utilizing all four platforms to engage with stakeholders.

Do the world's largest multinational firms even need to be utilizing Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and a corporate blog? Seven of the top ten companies on Fortune's list are oil companies. I'm not sure that ExxonMobil is really going to be able to elevate it's brand with a new Facebook fan page or have any kind of meaningful "conversation" with consumers on Twitter. Are there things that they could do? Sure. But you shouldn't get a pat on the back just for showing up.

I'm also bothered by "studies" like this which make zero attempt to calculate the value added from social media. It costs money to create and maintain a voice on major social media platforms. The service might be free, the content isn't. It's only worth the cost if the return is real value, in whatever form that value might take (PR, sales, awareness, etc.). When you start looking through the list of Fortune 100 companies that are using multiple social media platforms you realize that, while they might be there, they don't have anything to say.

Filed under  //

Comments [4]

Understanding the massiveness of Google

At the time of writing this, Google has about 20,000 employees and over $30 billion in assets. It's a massive company, but it's hard to wrap your head around what 20,000 people look like or what billions in assets even means. The massiveness of Google is lost on most people, including myself until I started looking into it. I wanted to get a better understanding of how one might use things like Google Code, the Google App Engine, or the Google Web Toolkit.

A few interesting tidbits about Google:

  • 87 different Twitter accounts
  • Over 100 active blogs
  • Over 1,000 YouTube videos

You might have seen a few of their blogs, but they have so many that they have their own blog directory, including regional blogs which provide localized information to people all over the world. There are teams running project that I didn't even know existed, like the O3D API team – which is working on a multi-platform plugin that allows 3D rendering within the browser.

One of the ideas me and a few coworkers had a while back was to create a presentation along the lines, "Everything you ever wanted to know about Google." The thing is, you couldn't fit that into a presentation. You would have trouble fitting it into a 10-part series. I'm starting to think that it may be adventageous for companies, particularly digital companies, to have a person who's job it is to understand Google and everything they offer. Search is massive enough, but they also own YouTube – which is the largest content channel on the Internet. And now they are getting into phones and even operating systems. They offer APIs for almost everything. Understanding all those different points of integration and how they might fit into a site or application would be a huge asset.

Google isn't just a search company. In many ways, Google is the Internet. If tomorrow Google disappeared, the entire world would grind to a hault. Google isn't often ranked with the likes of General Electric, Royal Dutch Shell or HSBC Holdings; but it's just as important—if not more so. It is more intertwined in the lives of everyone than I think most people realize. And as they move into new territory with Google Wave and Google Voice, Google is just going to become a more integral part of our everyday lives.

Filed under  //

Comments [0]

Social media will not save your business

I was jotting down some notes the other day and creating some buckets for different ways brands and individuals can actually use social media. Far too often I hear people talking about it in the abstract, as if having a Facebook page is going to change your business. Certain people seem to imply that if spend a lot of money on Facebook suddenly people are going to be handing you money, for whatever your selling, hand over fist. Good luck with that.

Anyway,

  1. Broadcast
    You create an account on Twitter, Faceook and YouTube and start putting out stuff, because that's what everyone else is doing. This includes most advertising, PR, community building, and content distribution. The problem is that this only effective for certain brands. It's great for large brands that can leverage their might. But for most brands, your message gets lost in a sea of other broadcast messages. If you're Coca-Cola you can do something awesome simply by allocating a massive production budget towards making original content. If you're a small soda company like Blue Sky, you can't.
  2. Actually talking to people (& having something interesting to say)
    You have to find someone who actually wants to talk to people. You may have to hire someone new. And by suggesting that you hire someone to talk to your customers, I don't mean an unpaid intern who's a "social media expert" because he or she knows how to create a MySpace profile. I mean hiring a real person, who participates in all your business activities, actually knows what's going on and likes the brand. It has to be someone interesting that has something to say,  someone who can actually go back to the product guys or R&D team with community feedback, and someone who has the ability to actually fix customer problems. If everyone is ranting about how crappy your customer service is on Twitter, and your response is to pipe in the RSS feed from your blog, you might as well just not use Twitter at all.
  3. Research and analytics
    If you understand what the Internet looks like for your industry, and you know how your consumers are using social media, you can gain a better understanding of consumer behavior and sentiment (with regards to both your products and your industry) by actually doing real research. Reviews and search trends have huge retail implications today, especially as we move into a world where everyone has a smart phone and can see what everyone else has ever had to say about a particular store or product at point of sale. Research, in this case, is a little bit more than just buying an out-of-the-box social media monitoring solution. If you sell spirits, you need to know where people are checking in on Foursquare, and how the number of stars on Yelp impacts your revenue. There are no simple solutions for this kind of analytics, so you're going to have to build a database from scratch.
  4. Interaction framework
    Once you understand consumer behavior in your category, you can start using social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter as an interaction framework. Facebook and Twitter both have single sign-on services that allow you to create applications that leverage a user's network of connections. And once you start getting users to engage with you through one of these methods, you can start tracking them. You can ping them. When you want to conduct research, you don't need to host focus groups. All you need to do is ask.

Just a few thoughts I had.